Punjab Divorce Certificate from Union Council:
If from Punjab you need divorce certificate from union council or child maintenance in Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. He claimed his cousin Ramzan wasn’t legally married to Ghulam Fatima since their divorce was ineffective under section MFLO. Chahar had not sent any notices of talaq to the Council chairman. The first husband, however, stated before the court that he had not revoked talaq. The court on divorce certificate from union council or child maintenance in Pakistan ruled that failing to give notice of talaq might lead to an irresistible presumption of talaq being revoked. However, each case must be considered on its merits. In this instance, the talaq was pronounced sometime between 15 and 18 years ago. It was never revoked expressly nor impliedly by the first spouse.
The court held that the section of the ordinance was intended for women and that it should not be taken to mean that they could lose their lives. The court determined that the talaq’s ineffectiveness was not due to the absence of notice. Ghulam Farida Chuhar v. Ghulam Fatima was relied upon by a Division Bench of the Supreme Court on divorce certificate from union council or child maintenance in Pakistan. Just the passing of the Protection of Women Criminal Laws Amendment Act (hereinafter Protection of Women Act), husbands not following subsection (?) of the section to notify talaq, could harass ex-wives and make accusations of Zina with new husbands.
Child Maintenance in Pakistan:
On divorce certificate from union council or child maintenance in Pakistan, this ended with the Protection of Women Act. Mst. Kaneez Fatima, the Supreme Court of Pakistan, while discussing. Gardezi’s rule was that failure to give notice of talaq to the Chairman was not a sufficient reason to conclude that talaq had been revoked. It may only be ineffective and not revoked” [italics provided]. This was the first case in which the Supreme Court on divorce certificate from union council or child maintenance in Pakistan overruled the Gardezi Rule.
Kaneez Fatima Settlement Case:
The Kaneez Fatima settlement was a mutually agreed divorce between the husband and his wife. In lieu of the prompt dower, the wife received rupees, tolas of silver and monthly maintenance in rupees. Both of the parties had agreed not to make any future claims against each other. Kaneez Fatima, the appellant, filed a suit in the family court to recover the remaining amount (i.e., rupees) and maintenance.
She claimed that the compromise was reached by coercion and that the chairman had never been given notice of the dissolution of marriage as required under section MFLO on divorce certificate from union council or child maintenance in Pakistan. It was ruled that “In case of consent by both the parties, divorce is effected” and “The notice can be sent at any time thereafter to comply with the provisions of the section.” In stating this, the court denied maintenance to the appellant. Commenting on Gardezi, the court stated, “So far, the observations in Syed Ali Nawaz Gardezi’s matter, it may be observed, that failure to notify the Chairman of the Union Council of talaq does not by itself mean that talaq was revoked.
Click Here: Is Unmarried Certificate is Must after Divorce?